I firmly believe that ethics and morality go before business, any time, even if at times it may be difficult.
If you had visited my blog earlier, you may have noticed there was a video at the bottom. It came from an application which gave an advertisement and then a video from a "channel". For my blog I had chosen Times Now, the TV news channel, because it had interesting news and some pieces about culture or Indian cooking I thought could be interesting for the readers as well.
But a few days ago I received an e-mail from a reader telling me the video being shown was a little "off", meaning immoral. I wrote to the providers asking them not to publish such videos but it seems it was not possible. I thought of giving it a few days...
This morning, when I opened my blog to see a comment which had been posted, I found another video which I thought was not apt for all public... I have removed the widget. It's a pity because there were also interesting news, and in theory I was earning some Rupees through that advertising (perhaps after 10 years I would have been able to buy a new keyboard out of that money!). Goodbye videos on my blog!
Talking about Business Ethics, perhaps you would like to visit and subscribe to this other blog. I subscribed a few weeks ago and seems to be good stuff: Business Ethics Blog, by Chris MacDonald.
Sorry for the pause in posts about the legal process, but the last two posts have come out somehow spontaneously. Next post will be about the forms 1, 18 and 32.
Showing posts with label legal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legal. Show all posts
Mar 30, 2009
Jan 27, 2009
Re-submitting an eForm

This happened to me this week after submitting Form 1A the other day. Few days after submitting I checked the "Transaction status" and found out that it was "Waiting for Clarification". As far as I had read, it was required to re-submit the form. However, when I tried doing it, the system didn't allow me.
I contacted via e-mail the MCA people and they replied very quickly and to the point after one or two days. Now they had changed my status and I could re-submit the form.
Today, while trying to do so it took me a while to find out how to do it, but finally got it: in the

Again, make sure you have downloaded and filled up a fresh Form 1A before you re-submit, otherwise, the system will reject you automatically.
Dec 29, 2008
You name it: book a name for your company

To avoid any kind of legal confusion, there cannot be two companies with the same name in the country. As a matter of fact, if you wanted to borrow a name from a foreign company you would need to get a NOC (non-objection certificate) from them allowing you to register your company with that name in India.
To apply for a name, and book it temporarily for 6 months (if you have not incorporated your company by then, you will need to apply again) you need to fill up and submit the Form 1A. This is a simple form where no much information is required… the only really relevant information are two things:
First, the DIN (Director Identification Number) of the directors (minimum two) for the proposed company (you can read about this in my previous post)
Second, the proposed names: you will have to give a few options (in case they reject the first one

While submitting this you will have to pay a fee of Rs.500 and you will get a reply to it after a week or two. Before submitting the form, to make almost sure they want reject it (at least not in the basis of availability) you should check whether the name is available. You can do that at the MCA (Ministry of Company Affairs) web-site: go to “Other Services” on the left-hand-side menu and click on “Check Company Name”. The tool does not work perfectly well, but it is useful: if there is a company which matches the name you have entered, you will get a list; but if there is no company with such name or similar you will not get any result at all, not even a message telling you so.
Nov 26, 2008
Legal: About Sole Proprietorship, Partnership Firm and Private Limited

Prior to this meeting I had read some information about the two proposed forms of business but
still had some doubts, hence we went to visit his CA.

This meeting again proved is important to do your homework... I could understand everything thanks to what I had learnt in the morning.
Either partnership firm or sole proprietorship have the same unstable or shaky or at least non-corporate look to other companies, while a private limited looks more reliable to your possible clients.
However, the difference in costs is quite significant. The upfront cost to set up a Private Ltd is at least Rs.15,000 to 20,000 (very minimum); for a partnership firm is about Rs.8,000; finally, for a sole proprietorship is nil: you just need to go to the bank and open your account in the company's name.
This is, as you can read here, because the sole Proprietorship depends directly on its owner, both for liability as well as taxes; in fact, the company and its owner are one. The same way, it is very similar for a partnership firm but the profits and liability is distributed among the partners.
Our conclusion is that for a business which is beginning and a large amount of investments has already been done, you should go for the Sole Proprietorship or Partnership Firm. But if you have time and money is better to go for Pvt. Ltd. as it will give a much more reliable outlook to your enterprise.
Update on 23-02-11: Would you like to see the Spanish translation? Click here!
Update on 23-02-11: Would you like to see the Spanish translation? Click here!
Labels:
accountant,
entrepreneur,
lawyer,
legal,
legal frame,
partnership firm,
ROC,
setting up,
sole proprietor,
start up,
taxes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)